Sunday, November 30, 2008

Mahesh Saranya Matrum Palar

My Review: Mahesh Saranya Matrum Palar



The makers don't proclaim it to be a classic or a masterpiece or a movie of the lifetime, yet it moves even those with stony heart to tears .This one joins the line of movies which became huge hits more due to thier strong climax than anything else like Love Today , Sollamale...etc."Kool productions", who gave us one of the better movies of this year in "Pudichirukku" have come back with yet another good one.

Plot: A glimpse of the life of MAHESH, SARANYA, MATRUM PALAR...

Sakthi: Man, this guy has improved by a mile from his forgettable debut.Here he has concentrated on perfecting one emotion at a time rather than trying to be "jack of all trade but king of none" as he tried in his debut.He has wonderfully underplayed his part to a great deal .Watch out for the climax scenes.He deserves special applause for that alone.

Sandhya: It is shocking to see her almost double the size since the time we last saw her.Not only she looks plump ,her acting also doesn't impress much.She looks more older than Sakthi.

Saranya Mohan: She continues with her merry cheerful self here too.She has more scope & screen space than Sandhya and has utilized it well.


As far as supporting cast goes , not everyone fits the bill.Some of their acting look amatuerish but a few like Sakthi's father , grandfather , Srinath and the one who comes as Sandhya's friend impresses.

Vidhyasagar's music and BGM is a shocker.Wondering what went wrong with him.It has been a while now since he has given a riveting musical.

Gunasekaran's cinematography is not spectacular but adequate & ably supports the story.

P.V.Ravi , who has written story, screenplay ,dialogs & has directed the movie , seems to believe in sticking on to a simple story which is told in an impressive ,fresh narrative style & ending it up with a stunning climax.Some scenes between Sandhya and Sakthi reminds us of the famous "Kushi" Vijay-Jothika confrontations with even similar dialogs thrown in.

The movie goes at a snail pace but the happening keeps one hooked to the screen.May be he would have added more depth to the love story .Than the impact would have been even greater.

Bottomline: Feel-good wholesome Family entertainer.

3.5/5

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Poo

My Review : Poo



"Poo" on-screen adaptation of Tamilselvan's short story "Veyilodu poi" is yet another one of those realistic cinema that we are getting to see more often now in Tamil Cinema.Sasi, who has 3 consecutive hits to his name each one different from the run of the mill stuffs, is back at it again with a bang."Poo" is an axample of how to tell a simple story in a more simpler form in celluloid and yet make a hard impact on the viewers. It also marks the debut of one of the most talented actress in recent times, Parvathy.

Plot: Story of the present day Andal's love for her Tirumal.

Parvathy : She is the protagonist of the movie and she fills the screen from the first frame till the last. The story has ample scope for her to perform and she has feasted upon the opportunity. Gamut of emotions come easy to her & none would believe that she is not a native of the area in which the movie is set. She has a very big future ahead if only she chooses her movies judiciously.



Srikanth: It is more of a glorified "guest role" .He does his part with elan which a degree of underplay.

Supporting cast especially Inbanila (last seen in 9 Rupai Nottu) who plays the heroine's friend , Ramu who plays Srikanth's father, the tea master with a curious name "Allo" and the one who plays Parvathy's mom are first rate.Kudos for the casting department.

P.G.Muthiah's camera has written poetry on screen.The dry arid red soil of the interior Tamil NAdu never looked so beautiful on screen. He has a very bright road ahead of him.

Veerasamar' art work enhances the movie's authenticity. Whether the palm trees, Tatched houses , fire-company , elementary schools....everything are done with great care & attention.

Madan Gunadeva's editing helps in the story move at a languid pace without any penchant for gimmickry.

Music is by S.S.Kumaran. Mark this man.Yet another talent unearthed this year.(incidently he is the 3rd M.D. introduced by Sasi after Bobby and Vijay Anthony) He rocks in his BGM score as well as in 3 of the songs."Chu chu Mari" lingers in our mind long after..

Screenplay , Dialogues & Direction is by Sasi.He comes back after a brief hiatus with a movie backed by his heart.His mastery over the medium is all there to see right through the movie.The use symbolisms like the 2 palm trees , the pet goat of the heroine and her love for it which symbolises the love for cousin , a goat going to altar just as Srikanth's marriage is fixed with a rich girl.....Also he deserves credit for keeping the grim tale with tinges of good humour right through.

His earthy dialouges tinged with humour , subtle emotions & had hitting realism , elevates the movie .

One negative is that except two songs rest of them don't stick on with the narrative.Rather they are more irritating than anything else .

Except that ,the movie is high class with a very poetic ending .Go for it if you don't mind sitting through it with patience.

Bottomline: Poo , flower with a pleasant fragrance.

4/5

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Thenavettu

My Review :Thenavettu



Jeeva has already found out that crass masala movies are not his forte with that forgettable "Pori" but sadly he seems not to have learned from it."Thenavetu" sadly will stick out like a sore thumb in his filmography along with "Pori" .

Plot: Hero loves a girl - Villan's son tries to molest her - hero beats him to death - villan tries to seek his revenge - Hero ends up triumphs against all odds - Hero-Heroine unite - a duet song in the end credits..........!so much for an innovative storyline...!!

Jeeva - Tries his hard to appear comfortable on screen but sadly he ends up unsuccessful as a village ruffian from Madurai coming to Chennai to work.Nowhere does he speak the Madurai dialect either. But he dances like a dream.

Poonam - reminds one of the angelical , goody-goody heroines of holy virtues & morals that we were accustomed to see on screen during the 70's and 80's . She turns up in glamorous outfits & shed her inhibitions in the songs though .(They are just dream sequences you see ..! )


Kanja Karupu tries his level best to elicit some laughter but sadly he fails in his endeavour.

RaviKale just hams his way through while Shafi as his psychotic son impresses but his punch dialogs get irritating after a while.

Saikumar , yesteryear hero , is wasted in a role of an inefficient police officer.

Songs by Srikanth Deva is nothing to write home about but choreography in that folk duet is quite interesting.

Technically the film is shoddy .

Kathir , who debuts with this movie ,treads the safe path of his guru but sadly the masala lacks in taste.

Bottomline : Stay Away.

2/5

Varanam Ayiram

My Review : Varanam Ayiram




A movie that pays tribute to Father-son relationship.Whereas"Thavamai Thavamirunthu" by Cheran was a "realistic" portrayal of the theme "Varanam Ayiram" from the famous Gautham-Surya-Harris Jayraj combo is an "idealistic" one.TT was successful in forging an Emotional connect with the viewers which is precisely what VA lacks in .When two of the lead actors die in the movie it never creates any sentiment on the viewers due the artificiality in characterization .But Gautham has woven a fairytale script which keeps one engrossed to the screen right through the 3 hours fairly successfully though the proceedings turn out to be too postive to be real.

Plot : it is an elegy of the son to his deceased father...

Surya : It is Surya's movie right through.He fills up the screen with gaiety & aplomb .And the amount of work he has put in to transform himself from head to foot to portray various shades of his character brings out tears in oneself & he deserves a standing ovation for it.His vast improvement in his footwork also shows up in the songs as well.


Among the lead ladies , though none has a substantial role to play,Simran proves her worth as a seasoned campaigner meanwhile Sameera Reddy shines in the scene in which she accepts her love for Surya though throughout the rest of her part she has to only flash her beautiful smile on screen.

Divya has impresses with an underplayed performance in a miniscule role.



Songs are already chartbusters and Harris Jayraj once again proves his mettle. However the same cannot be said of the song picturisation which is certainly not Gautham's forte. Especially the first two songs are more of a "spoof" of the songs of the 70's & 80's respectively.

Rathnavelu's hardwork lights up the screen & the colour contrast that he has attempted for various moods & phases of Surya's life enhances the mood of the proceedings.

Anthony has refrained from his usual gimmickry & thus from hurting our eyes.

Gautham , who has scripted & directed the movie has done a neat job in yarning various threads in the life of the protagonist without any confusion & hence the lenght remains never a problem.Starting as a classy movie it meanders the routine commercial path before getting stranded in between.

Also one wishes we too to be showered upon all the good fortunes that the lead players is showered upon like love at first sight , a willing girl not one but two , a father who is so supportive that he sends his son all the way to US only to pursue his love, the US Visa officials who are more than glad to grant him Visa for the same reason , the way he recovers from drug addiction , as easily as he can rescue a kidnapped child in an unknown terrain ..................Everything in his life seem to be ridiculously so easy !

Bottomline: A movie set in Utopia.

3.5/5

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Seval

My review : Seval



Hari is one director who is caught up with in the Time-machine of 80's cinema.And almost all his movies follow a routine action-sentiment formula bounded with a racy script . He believes in his hero's "aruval" & heroine's "Kanner" which make up a deadly combo ,spiced up with oodles of Male chauvinisms & age old rediculous superstitions . Ironically with this he has done wonders in his constituency which is ladies & rural audiences of south. Cola sipping , Pizza munching , IT kiddos please excuse.!

Plot: Age old story of a ruffian falling in love with a girl of angelical qualities & problems that they face before finally uniting in the end......!

Barath: He has done justice to his role well.He is every inch a village wastrel who is out of the bounds of his father strictness. Also he has shown the contrast in his character that undergoes a change after his tryst with love. But it is comical to see him as a 40 year old though !

Poonam Bajwa: Hats-off to her courage for shaving her head .I don't think there is any actress in the whole of India who would have done it except it was a Shabana Azmi or a Nandhitha Das (who did it for "Water" before it got shelved.)But the sad part that it appears to be forced into the movie rather than what the script exactly wanted. She has a good future ahead as she is good in the emoting aspect as well.


Simran: She neither has a big part to play nor her part is much powerful as it was proclaimed to be.Rather her role is very regressive one in the days of female rights & forward looking modern women.

Vadivelu: Tickles the funny bones well. Esp. the scene in which he reads a letter with "Padithathum kilithuvidavum" written in it is very hilarious.

Sampath : Not a well etched out role .All through his only part is to ogle at the heroine.

Supporting cast includes Rajesh , Y.G.Mahendran ,Yuvasri,Prem , Krishna--all have done their parts well.

Music by G.V.Prakash is a downer.He seems to go downhill after his "Veyil" days.

Priyan , a Hari constant , has captured the flower fields & natural beauty of Nellai well.

What V.T.Vijayan failed to do , the theater operators have succeeded in doing.They have trimmed the movie by half an hour it seems which makes the movie to not lag that much.

Coming to Hari , he has forced sentiments into the movie unlike his previous ones. Take for instance the "heights of sentiment" that this movie try to achieve - that of the heroine's head getting shaven. She accepts to get her head shaven only to prove that Barath has no place in her life & will serve the family of her in-laws untill her death knowing pretty well that they are a treacherous gang.But a frame later she does exactly what she was accused of in the first place..!!!

Bottomline: average

3/5

Friday, October 10, 2008

Netru,Indru,Nalai

My REview :Netru,Indru,Nalai




First i must clear two misconceptions regarding the movie.

1) First , it is not a bilingual , as the makers claim it to be. 90 % of the movie seems to be dubbed from Telugu and they have shots of some famous landmarks of Chennai in between the narration to give a feel that the story is happening in Chennai !

2) Also don't get fooled by the importance given to Tamannah in the trailers and publicity posters of the movie . If you want to see the movie for the sake of seeing her , better you take a look at the trailers of the movie ...That is all the part that she plays in the movie as well. Not an inch more than that.

Plot : If there is any , than those who have seen this movie please explain to me.

The title doesn't have anything to do with the movie ....The scenes depicted as INDRU-portray the life of the hero , which lasts for days,weeks.... ; for NETRU - the life history of the villian , a Dada , is shown ...; & finally director flashes the words NALAI -- may be intended at the consequence of those who have watched the movie courageously ....!



The credits informs a list of names as ACTORS , But none seem to justify the claim.

Dilague writer Prasannakumar shows of his misogynistic attitude with his dialogues full of spewing venom towards the females ..

AND ,

How long does these Bigoted filmmakers going to portray a penniless , jobless , good for nothing pauper loving a rich girl as HERO and a sensible , forthright girl who refuses the love of such a loser for some better prospects as a VAMP.

The much publicized erotic song featuring Ravikrishna and Akshara (Of Punnagai Poove fame) is downright crass and vulgar even after being heavily censored . It is a shocker that the movie has got U/A .

The director Laxmikanth is totally at sea with a very purposeless script and inept direction .

Bottomline : Trash

1.5/5

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Dhurai

My Review : Dhurai



Arjun's follow up to one of his major hits "Marudhamalai" was keenly expected by all but sadly " Dhurai " fails to live up to the expectations.Arjun's Story & screenplay plays the spoilsports here which fails to liven up the proceedings .

Plot : About political power struggle & conspiracies within a party .

Arjun : He is dashing on screen with a well toned up body which he flashes often in the movie . As far the acting goes he is little irritating as an amnesic in the first half but regains his feet in the second half as a man bent to seek revenge.

There are 3 heroines but all are used as properties without a inch of scope to perform , not that they are itching to show of thier acting prowess either . Keerath in particular seems to think that flashing her teeth on to the camera is all about acting.

Vivek irritates as usual trying to emulate Vadivelu .

Music by D.Iman , who is usually good at remixing has miserably murdered the classic "Raja..rajai rajan intha raja .." by remixing it .It feels terrible to hear the remix version of one of Raja sir's beauty .

Cinematographer Laxmipathy (Debutant) tries his best to show his prowess but he seem to have battled with the limited resources .

Editor seems to have slept off during the entire process of editing this movie. 2:20 mins seem to go on & on.

A.Venkatesh , who has a name as a reliable commercial director has faltered this time as the script just refuses to help his causes .

Bottomline : Movie joining the list of Pandhayam & Sakkarakatti ....

1.5/5